Yes but if Ken said something more lenient that the official (invisible VFP) word, it would be better than nothing.

I guess I didn't read Ken's link very well the first time. It looks pretty clear to me now.

>>> And since there are differences as to what qualifies for what, depending on what Microsoft info you read, it will be good to get an uptodate word from them. <<
>
>I would think it would be pretty hard for them not to honor the terms as stated in a Microsoft document (complete with part number!). That seems to me more official than something said in a newsgroup.
>
>Mike