>>
>>Hmm.. Marc, I don't know, and couldn't find it anywhere. When I have a moment I'll check. I only use it in SEEK, so I never thought about Rushmore.
>
>No I am sure that you (used to) kill Rushmore with ==. Arnon pointed that out some time ago. I thought that maybe in VFP5a, things were different. ... And how do you use == in SEEK. Must be a new syntax.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Marc

PS In fact, == is not listed as an optimizable operation.