Ivan

I did a lot of talking with Fabio about Frx2Word and I saw a lot of improvements over the last year. But I found myself using a versio over 6 months old because I found it was more stable then the current version. Hard to say why except thet the complaint level went down when I reintroduced the older version.

At this stage I started to look at Frx2any. I use it to generate word attachments as well as html attachments (you need a separate licence key for each type of attachments). In some ways I feel disloyal because I have used Frx2word very effectively in the past but now I am increasingly using Frx2any because it is very eady to use (easier than Frx2word) and I think it is a more stable product.

BTW neither product has managed to create html which can be emailed consistently well as body of text - this is my ultimate goal. I want to send personalised and snazzy body of text messages as body of text rather than as attachments because I think they are more likely to be read.

For my money I would pick Frx2any.

HTH

Colin