Fernando,

I didn't misread your posted message. I'm also not going to get into an argument about it with you.

>David,
>
>Please let me add a bit more to what I told you in my previous reply.
>
>Reading, once more, your message to me:
>
>"The cost is in the manhours it takes to process additional bug reports. You and anyone else can apply to become a beta site.
>
>Made me wonder:
>
>It seems true to me that the "DevCon beta", a public beta, will NOT have any kind of bug reporting facility associated with it (and Ken's reply earlier suggests that only the beta is staffed for this).
>
>Accordingly, you either did not read my message properly (I was proposing a wider distribution of the "DevCon beta") or your argument does not apply.
>
>Regards,
>
>Fernando