>>I haven't begun learning about .Net yet. But when I do (or should I say if I do) I'll definitely learn C# over VB.Net
>>
>>Reasons
>>
>>1) C# was submitted to ECMA (international stardards organization).
>>2) If .Net thing does'nt catch on (This is very unlikely to happen but who knows) then having learned C# will have made it easier for me to get to C++ or Java. So for me learning C# is a win-win situation.
>
>I am using C#, but here are some reasons against using it.
>1) The code completion isn't as extensive as VB.NET

A service pack will probably fix this

>2) There are more books on VB.NET than C#

It's not the quantity it's the overall quality. Perhaps there needs to be more boks in VB because it's not as well thought of as C# <g>.

That reminds me of a popular saying. Why makes things easy when you can make them more complicated. <bg>