>With a little more time, this is what I am referring to in my previous message: Message #
352283 Thread #
351963I knew posting that was a bad idea at the time, but I didn't know it would come back to haunt me years later....
>See both John's online response and subsequent private emails sent by both parties in the discussion.
Eh? Karl replied to that message, not John, and what "subsequent private emails" are these, pray tell?
