>Hi!
>
>The most strange is that I was able to reroduce this... Only once! Next time whatever I did, I got correct results for both VFP6 and VFP7.
>
>Seems it is dependent on some sort of development environment nusianses, like internal query of records from PJX file, for example :).
>
>Did you tried to test it in run-time?
>
>If this does not exists in run-time - no resons to worry about. This is not a big problem when running this just from command Window in VFP development environment.
And I think it happens in command window. When you type DIME{space}, Intellisense kicks in - and since it's (got parts) written in VFP, it locates a record in foxcode.dbf, and that affects the _tally. It becomes 1? Well, one record matches DIME, right?