>>Hello Foxperts,
>>
>>Is the following code 'proper'?

>>REPLACE reprints WITH reprints+1 FOR flagged="P"
>>REPLACE flagged WITH "O"  FOR flagged="P"

>>or should I do this:

>>SCAN FOR flagged="P"
>>  REPLACE reprints WITH reprints+1, flagged WITH "O"
>>ENDSCAN

>>
>>Any comment and critique gratefully accepted.
>
>
>

>REPLACE reprints WITH reprints+1 ;
>   flagged WITH "O":
>   FOR flagged="P"

>
>Provided you don't have a current order on flagged. Much faster than two replaces.

Dragan,
Unlike scan..endscan I think this wouldn't be affected by current order.
Cetin