Don't you think the ALL might have something to do with it?

cheers

>>>

>>>REPLACE reprints WITH reprints+1 ;
>>>   flagged WITH "O":
>>>   FOR flagged="P"

>>>
>>>Provided you don't have a current order on flagged. Much faster than two replaces.
>>
>>Dragan,
>>Unlike scan..endscan I think this wouldn't be affected by current order.
>
>Amazingly, you're right! :)
>
>Here's proof:
>

CREATE CURSOR temp (nfld i, cfld c(10))
>FOR i=1 TO 20
>	INSERT INTO temp (nfld, cfld) VALUES (RECNO(), "abc")
>ENDFOR
>INDEX ON cfld TAG fld
>
>replace ALL nfld WITH nfld*10;	
>	cFld WITH TRIM(cFld)+"d"
>	
>browse