Information générale
Catégorie:
Base de données, Tables, Vues, Index et syntaxe SQL
Soft locking works good for me. In this app, there's no reason to have the record physically locked. It's good enough to essentially mark it as being "checked out" by a person. I'm going to try the suggestion from another thread of putting the "checked out" records in another table, which eliminates the need for the extra TABLEUPDATE().
Thanks,
Michelle
>We used to do this (SoftLock) in the Fox 2.6 days and haven't been specific at the User-level since, but I am very interested in this thread...I would like to figure a way to do this myself in VFP.
>
>The TableUpdate() command will return Record #s for un-updateable records as an Error array, if these could be captured beforehand somehow...
>
>Just some thoughts.
>
>-Irv.
>
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement