Noted.
Thanks Claude.

>Gary, just to clarify, I said in the message below "your mtdll", but, in this case, it's your mtdll recompiled as an EXE com server to allow the interactive debugging
>>Claude:
>>
>>>Not having done it with ActiveVFP yet, I would suggest you look at the places where he calls the VFP mtdll(starting with main.prg) and see if it's possible to substitute your mtdll. Also, making note of where he's using the flag to check for debugging...
>>
>>I will do and I will let you know how I get on!
>>
>>Best