>Hi, Jim.
>
>>The reply by Mr. Brown suggests that the VFP documentation, at least as written under the "COM Interfaces" entry (which actually displays the "DEFINE CLASS command", needs revision, specifically in the table under the "CParamName AS Type" write-up about half way down the full entry.
>>Do you agree? Do you know of other places in the documentation that fail to communicate this (or, as is the case here, MIS-communicates it)?
>>cheers
>
>On that tamble, at least in my VFP help, I can clearly see that the VFP "datetime" is mapped to "date" in COM. Isn´t that what is shown to you?

Claudio,

What am I missing here?...
The table says

VFP Defined Type   COM typelib Conversion   Intellisense quick info
Date                      DATE                      Date
DateTime                  DATE                      Date

If "DATE" is supposed to mean 'datetime' (which seems doubtful to me, but that could be the intent of typing it as they did) then it could at least mention this. How would one be expected to know this?
At the very very least the VFP type for Date deserves extra notation to tht effect.