>>The list of new/improved features is utterly FANTASTIC and will undoubtedly extend our reach immeasureably.
>>
>>The October issues of the UT Magazine/Rapozine features an interview with KenL and one of the earlier questions relates to "The documentation has really been improved.".
>>
>>This is a subject of great interest to some of us (I think even many of us) and I did not see it listed as an item in the list of VFP8 deliveries.
>>
>>I think that it merits inclusion in the list of new/improved features and that some elaboration on the nature of the changes would be of interest.
>
>While I've spent some time with Help, I haven't really dug into the structural changes, so I'm sure I'm leaving stuff out.
>
>There's been some restructuring of topics to make some sections of Help more task-oriented. There's also a new Samples and Walkthroughs section. Also, lots of changes and corrections in response to feedback.
>
>In addition, every topic includes a "Send feedback on this topic to Microsoft" link that allows you to easily tell Microsoft what you think should be changed.

Thanks Tamar. What about simple "structural" changes aimed at improving the 'speed' of its utility? Things like:
1) Stating what is returned, not just the type, when applicable;
2) Stating "Optional" beside the parameter name line when it is an optional parameter;
3) Stating the default, when applicable, in the parameter name line itself as opposed to within the definition or the remarks section;
4) Something to make changes from the immediately prior version easy to identify.



>
>Tamar