The way I see it, RV is the nearest to CursorAdapter coz you're dealing with cursors minus the DBC. Since it's a cursor, we can take advantage of or the Replace, Scans, etc.


>Hi John,
>
>I'm rewriting an 1 tier app into C/S in VFP 7. The application should work with both local data as remote data as transparent as possible. Therefore I decided to use (remote and local) views where possible for accessing the data. For the cases where SPT is required there is code written to handle those cases. So basicly the app is both 1 tier as 2 tier (classic C/S).
>
>Since, I don't own a copy of VFP 8 beta, I cannot determine the best strategy to take advantage of the cursor adapter class when this project is build in VFP 8.
>
>Are there special considerations in order to make a VFP 7 to VFP 8 transitions as smooth as possible ? Could you tell more about the advantages of using the cursor adapter class ?
>
>Walter,
>
>
>
>>Hi Walter,
>>
>>Good question. Can you provide more details? Is this traditional 2-tier C/S or n-tier?
>>
>>
>>>Hi john,
>>>
>>>O.K. I've got a question.
>>>
>>>I'm busy writing a C/S app in VFP 7. Since it won't be released before early next year, I guess I want to take advantage of the features of VFP 8.
>>>
>>>One of the features I really like is the Cursor adapter class. Now the question is how to prepare my VFP 7 project so that when using the cursor adapterclass it takes the least amount of effort to implement this.
>>>
>>>Any thoughts ?
>>>
>>>Walter,