Hi!
No, it is not a documentation oversignt - it really does not works. My thought is that support of XP schemes and a few other features (such as use of new common images DLL library) caused that.
>I just got to install my 8.0 beta, and in reading the documentation it appears that the runtime doesn't support NT (as well as 95). Was this just a documentation oversight? While I kind of understand the development environment only supporting 2000 SP2+ and XP, isn't this a bit of overkill for the runtime? Is there something truly lacking in NT that is present in 98? Was it a case of NT 4.0 SP 6a, would have worked, but not other (earlier) versions?
>
>Anyone know - care to speculate?
>
>Rick
Vlad Grynchyshyn, Project Manager, MCP
vgryn@yahoo.comICQ #10709245
The professional level of programmer could be determined by level of stupidity of his/her bugs
It is not appropriate to say that question is "foolish". There could be only foolish answers. Everybody passed period of time when knows nothing about something.
