>>> What you don't know is that, in fact, a number of MVP's have expressed dismay over the UT being the host for the wish list. Many of us don't believe that it belongs on a private, non-MSFT site for which you have to pay for full access. <<
>
>Add one former MVP to that count. I find it shocking that Microsoft wants to do it this way.
>
>Mike

I don’t see how anyone is really shocked over this. It has been publicly stated that the VFP website did not need content updating because the community had other resources that fulfilled the need.
Disappointed yes, shocked, no.
In any case, I’m appreciative to the UT for making the wish list facility available.