Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Type function is not smart enough
Message
From
25/10/2002 11:38:29
 
 
To
25/10/2002 09:25:10
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Coding, syntax & commands
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00714883
Message ID:
00715475
Views:
22
>>>>Hi Vlad,
>>>>
>>>>My guess is that TYPE() function doesn't evaluate UDF's for performance reason.
>>>
>>>And how about side-effects? The UDF might do almost anything.
>>
>>I agree with your analysis. The UDF could be called with a reference parameter, and in fact return nothing at all in the normal sense.
>
>Yes, but apart from return-values, I meant that the function might have undesirable side effects. That is, apart from returning a value, the UDF might change the environment, close the application, delete data, etc.
>
>Hilmar.

I figured that was what you meant.

I just wanted to point out a very obvious situation in which things get changed even if no return value happens. Clearly one would not want current variables changed just to check the return type of a UDF.

Alan
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform