Plateforme Level Extreme
Abonnement
Profil corporatif
Produits & Services
Support
Légal
English
Type function is not smart enough
Message
De
28/10/2002 13:32:19
 
 
Information générale
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Catégorie:
Codage, syntaxe et commandes
Divers
Thread ID:
00714883
Message ID:
00716112
Vues:
41
Well, I suppose then that means that all our guesses are kind of out to lunch. Vlad makes a very good point about the overriding of Object methods. There seems to be little, if any, difference (thinking in terms of either performance or risk) in running a udf or an overridden method. Certainly VFP can't know ahead of time where either will lead.

Where that leaves us, I'm not sure, unless it is nothing more than an oversight on the part of the VFP developer team. But since the object method side of it got 'fixed' in VFP8, I doubt it's an oversight.

Just one of those things, I guess.

Alan

>Yep.
>
>>Ok, then, but that still leaves open the question of whether or not UDF's are evalutated by Type() in VFP8.
>>
>>Do I take it from your answer that even in VFP8 (I don't have it), Type() still refuses to return a value for UDF's?
>>
>>Alan
>>
Précédent
Suivant
Répondre
Fil
Voir

Click here to load this message in the networking platform