>>Nope. We'll have to come up with a new name for the complainers that 3.1 with Fox is dead. (s) Let's see we already have 'dinosours'. Hmmmmm.... (s)
>
>It's not me (I develop under 95). It's my clients.
>BTW, I'm not sure if you understood that I want to develop W3.1 apps under W95.

I know. I just like to poke fun. Odds are, the need for 3.1x apps will still be around for a while. If you talk to Lucien, he's still got demand for Fox 2.0 DOS apps. I guess I've been lucky so far: Most of my clients are small businesses that are buying a computer for the first time, with all the goodies already on it, so.....

Scot.