>>That wasn't my point, I was wondering why the people who disapprove here said nothing in far more serious instances. If you did not see the posts to which I refer, that answers it.
>
>I suspect it's because most didn't want to engage JVP.
>
>Tamar

Tamar;

I must agree with you. Engaging him in dialogue would all too often lead to grief. It got to the point where it seemed he was a source of flesh for the vultures to enjoy. When someone expresses an attitude I do not appreciate I attempt to avoid confrontation. Others enjoy the battle and the Internet is well suited to this sort of display.

If a Cactus has spines why attempt to embrace it? Some know the result and enjoy the pain.

Tom