>Well, they've invaded Kuwait in the past, have been paying the families of suicide bombers in Isreal, have attacked the Kurds living in Iraq. No, I don't think they would use the weapons maliciously.

If the best you can do to convince us that because they've been hostile in the past, they intend to attack us, then I'm going to side with Iraq here.

The United States in the only country in the world that has used a Nuke on a modern city. Twice. Now we're threatening to overthrow the Iraqi government (only with the nice little slogan "regime change")

If I were Iraq, I would be trying to get UN Resolutions passed to protect me from the violent and belligerent American Government, even if that means striking first. Using your line of reasoning, you would tend to agree, no?