Hi Alejandro,

>I was thinking about the fact that VFP tables are not contained in a monolithic file (or two) that guarantees they are synchronized, but I see that is not a requirement to be considered relational, and am willing to concede the point.

I didn't mean to hammer you so hard. I guess I'm less of a purist and more of a practical guy. I have yet to find a data-centric desktop size application where VFP came up short.

>
>What I was trying to argue is that even if VFP were not considered relational, that is no reason for the professor to think less of it.

Ahhhh professors. Them who can't do, teach!

Hugh