Information générale
Titre:
Trigger tables slower in VFP 8 than VFP7 ?
Hi All,
The trigger of table is it slower in VFP 8 than VFP 7?
I use Xcase 6.03 to build my tables.
The code is generated with xcase in my tables.
It is identical Code for the triggers under VFP 7 and VFP8
Here the time of VFP7 ( Coverage )
Code = Replace nlit WITH 0 In resident
0.000229,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,313,c:\cdbk70\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,13
0.000076,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,314,c:\cdbk70\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,13
0.000036,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,315,c:\cdbk70\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,13
0.007115,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,316,c:\cdbk70\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,13
0.000063,,__ri_update_resident,1619,c:\cdbk70\amline\data1\amline.dct,14
0.000027,,__ri_update_resident,1620,c:\cdbk70\amline\data1\amline.dct,14
Here the time of VFP8
0.000463,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,314,c:\cdbk80\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,9
0.000042,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,315,c:\cdbk80\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,9
0.679659,cdbmanageform,cdbmanageform.doactions,316,c:\cdbk80\common30\libs\ccustfrm.vct,9
0.009005,,__ri_update_resident,1619,c:\cdbk80\amline\data1\amline.dct,10
0.000021,,__ri_update_resident,1620,c:\cdbk80\amline\data1\amline.dct,10
What a difference!
0.679659 > 0.007115
What occurs you it?
thank you in advance.
bernhart
Suivant
Répondre
Voir le fil de ce thread
Voir le fil de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement
Voir tous les messages de ce thread
Voir tous les messages de ce thread à partir de ce message seulement