>>If yours is filtering it out as porno, then probably that's why. Mine just calls it 'personal'.
>>
>>I remember when the Clinton hearings were going on, I couldn't read about them on at least one standard news reporting site because the filter said it was a 'sex site'.
>>
>>Alan
>Some time ago, when I first ran into the problem of dubious classification of sites I went to the effort of finding the site for the web filter we were using. It had a page describing its criteria in classifying pages for degrees of unsuitability, unfortunately I couldn't look at that page because it was classified as pornographic.

Now that is good! LOL!

Alan