Vlad,

>Hi, Jim!
>
>Well, I certainly agree with you, but think on this from another side. Would you leave in the wishes list a wish like "Please, improve VFP 7 a bit!"??? I guess no, because such wish is too generic.

Definitely such wishes offer nothing and so I would say they can go without impact.

>
>I think this kind of wish (like error messages improving) should also be more specific and split to several wish entries - one for each issue. This way at least MS guys will be sure they correctly understood what is needed to improve for develoeprs.

If 'one for each issue' means, really, one for each message, then I do not agree. I look at existing wish #522 and its comments and I think that it gets the correct message across and the comments reinforce as well as add detail.
I have no problem if people *do* enter a separate wish for a specific error message too, but I also think that it is asking too much to REQUIRE specificity on an issue like this. After all, there are probably 250+ error messages and the issue is generic across many of them.

SNIP