>IF MS accepts 80% coverage as adequate (and I realize you did NOT say that) then they can only do themselves a disservice in the long run.
>
>In any case, I hope and expect that "pride of workmanship" alone pushes the vast majority of VFP developers to test their code to as close to 100% as possible.
Is this opinion backed with actual experience with code coverage on a non-trivial app?
Mike Stewart