>> Revisions, enhancements, and new development should all be treated the same: 100% coverage where possible.
>
>IBM's study on code coverage concluded that anything beyond 80% doesn't give good bang for the buck.

Hi Mike,

After your session in DevCon, I mentioned Six Sigma to you, are you aware of any sources that deal with applying the philosophy to software development?

For those unfamiliar with the term, it's a school of thought developed by Motorola a few years ago, whose goal is to reduce errors to somewhere in the 0.000something% range.

Alex