Trey,

Actually, I made a mistake and there are 4 fields not 3.
Our record source was 'alias'.
We just did a test on both XP and 98 workstations runing VFP 7 sp1.
If we add 50 units to the width of the 2nd field and that causes the 4th field to extend past the end of the form, there is no problem.
If we add 100 units (in total) as above, only the last two fields display in the combo.

>hmm, I just tried this and it works just fine for me...
>specifically,
>1) created a form in VFP6
>2) added a combobox with 3 columns and put long strings in each
>3) set the columncount to 3
>4) set the columnwidths to fit the long strings
>5) put copies of the combo at different places on the form, to see if it extended past right and left sides
>
>ran it in vfp6 and vfp7 and it worked the same in each. extended past the form, left and right; showed all 3 columns
>
>if you set the combo to have RowSourceType=0 and use AddItem() and AddListItem() to add items, do you still have the same problem?
>how about on a form created directly in VFP7?
>
>SWAG: i wonder if this is an OS issue? what OS did you see this under? do you have other machines with different OS's you can see it under?
>
>
>>We recently converted a VFP 6 to VFP 7 and found that the behavior of the display of the list items in a Combo Box was different between 6 & 7.
>>
>>Assuming that the total width of the columns exceeded the remaining horizontal space on the form - VFP 6 would still display the line past the right hand side of the form. VFP7 only displays the rightmost column.
>>After we thought about this we realized that VFP 6 had a bug which was fixed in VFP 7.
>>
>>My question is, based upon the above example, which other 'bugs' have been fixed in VFP 7 that might cause our application to work differently?
>>
>>TIA.