>>However, the description of the TABLEUPDATE() function itself makes ABSOLUTELY NO MENTION of the CursorAdapter class and of the specific considerations inherent in TABLEUPDATE's use with that class!!! Not even in the "See also" list.
>>
>
>Well, I am following Doug's lead a bit here. All I will say is, the term "CursorAdapter" is in the tableupdate() topic 15 times, including a section in the Remarks titled "Interaction with CursorAdapter Objects".

That's excellent news Bob.
Not only for the fact that this concern is well addressed, but also that it bodes well (as Doug said and I was skeptical of) for lots of other stuff too.

I guess I should withhold future worries about the beta documentation that I have in hand.

thanks