>>I'm a big believer in technology, but I don't think we'll see (no pun intended) invisible machinery in our lifetime.
>
>Such a machine already exists, its called a black hole :-)

A black hole is machinery? That's a big machine.


>All we need is a little furthur understanding of QM. I haven't seen anything yet that suggests that specific photons cannot be isolated an blocked... or halted, or whatever.
>
>If the machine does not reflect light, it will never bee seen.

This is true, but to be truely invisible it would have to also not block light coming from what's on the oposite side of the observer.


>An equally interesting machine would be a device that can "block" the graviton particle, the particle that causes gravity. Imagine the disruptions you could cause with that!

I try not to. My heard's already hurting from this invisible car thing.
But, if that did exist and that technology was used in my new big black hole machine. I'd finally be able to show it to everybody.