>The result is the same in Silicon Valley. Our company even had speakers from Microsoft come to tell us all about .NET. VFP is not an option and is not promoted by Microsoft. Corporations listen to Microsoft and the word is go .NET. How can you go wrong by following the advice of Microsoft? Where does Microsoft spend its money? On promoting VFP or .NET? It can all be so much fun. :)

In suggestion from Venelina's, anyone would be interested if UT would launch a survey for knowing how much VFP developers would be in favor or making VFP 9.0 to be VFP.NET instead? That would include keeping the product as is, more powerful, more flexibilities but with a full recognition into the .NET framework.