Thanks for your response. I haven't tried it. This procedure is a simplified version a much larger process. I assume I could work around it, but would rather not have to. Rather than return to synchronous processing, I would break the routine into simple steps and monitor each step manually.
Previous
Reply
View the map of this thread
View the map of this thread starting from this message only
View all messages of this thread
View all messages of this thread starting from this message only