Hi!

I understand your point. My point is that there are way too many cases for using objects inside of column with sparse=.F., and thus it is very hard to make something "universal", and, at the same time, flexible (that satisfies all cases that were in grid before).

I know situations when Sparse=.F. mode is required to work as it is now, because in certain situations automatic change of back color is not desired bejavior.

I agree that BOTH things would be good.

However, I just though that for mentioned rare cases when this behavior is not needed, I can easy use "old" approach for row highlighting (with use of DynamicBackColor), so not a problem.

BTW, this is a known issue, as far as I know, and probably will be fixed in next versions of VFP.


>Vlad,
>
>Don't quite understand your point here...
>
>The Sparse property bears no relationship to HighlightForecolor and AllowCellSelection functionality. In fact, by definition, setting AllowCellSelection renders Sparse = .T. moot because individual cells never take the focus.
>
>Current behavior defeats the authors intent to allow an entire grid row to appear highlighted. There are some other anomalies that could also be addressed, such as checkboxes not being highlighted. These issues impact the effectiveness of the new feature.
>
>I won't be able to use it in it's current state, as much as I'd like to.
>
>JMO,
>Jeff