>It finally dawned on me that you have the survey question posted on the UT main page. You didn't say so and I thought you wanted feedback in this thread.

Ah, ok :)

>As someone (Paul?) already said, the survey is flawed as stated. There should be a choice along the lines of "Leave the product name unchanged". Based on the comments in this thread, that would seem to be getting the most votes at the moment.

Well, despite the fact that "Leave it to MS team" may not include necessary it, this is what I'd choose in such a situation. Basically, if you want to keep as is, it mostly relate to still continue to rely on MS VFP team for its naming.

I mentioned to Cathy that if we would restart it, I would add this choice for additional clarifications. But, we already started it over this afternoon and I believe we should remain without those parameters. The good change was done with the restartup. The actual version is much better than the first version.

The survey reflects presently the repartition of the related discussions on UT since a few months. Some really want to push it to .NET, some would prefer to have "for .NET" in it, which is quite ok as well as there is a lot of work which has been done to have it to integrate well with .NET and some like it as is or would prefer to leave it to MS. But, there is a message here. If it is that splitted then there is some considerations that could be taken here.