>>It's not that I mind terribly that the wish has been edited and placed on the Europa wish list, afterall, the addition of the NODRIVER clause would remove the necessity to re-save existing reports. What is annoying is that no one from the UT bothered to tell me this was being done or asked my permission.
>
>It is mentioned at the top. Since two weeks, based on MS's resquest, we are removing/arranging duplicates and some other related actions like that. That could include taking a comment on one wish to decide to create a wish on its own, assuming the comment should be a wish. Or, it could mean that one wish be moved as a comment to another wish assuming the other wish is best to be kept and a common in it would be better. Some other variations are also applicable. We just follow our guidelines and we indicated it at the top. Vlad has done some extensive work on that in two weeks. And, we are extremely happy with that work including comments from MS we already received about it. Additionnaly to Vlad and the MS team, Jim, Nadya and other UT members also participated in a lot of enhancements/fixes in the actual data. If something, or if you think something is wrong here, you may address directly to Randy as MS.

Michel,

First, don't get me wrong. I'm not mad or anything like that. However, the heading at the top (and I just re-read it) mentions nothing about editing a wish.

As I recall (and since I can't see my original post, I have to rely on my recollection), my wish was in an "and/or" mode. So from my POV, it was granted.

My point wasn't the wish itself, but that I don't like getting credit when I don't deserve it (See MESSAGE#730090).

I'm not going to remove it at this time, however. Toledo is still being prepared for release and until it is, I think it's premature to try to determine what's going to be in the product and what isn't in some cases. An example of the is another report command clause. I'll pose you a question. Can we now (in 8.0) suppress the display of the printing dialog so that reports can be printed from an in-process server?