I've voted against date-based version numbers for several years. This goes back to when I developed with Clipper. There was a Summer 87 version, but you had to check the time stamp to make sure you had the 2:00 AM release. It's much too complicated. IMO, sticking with version numbers is much easier.

Also, MS has overused .NET. They have even admitted this. VFP does not use the CLR, so .NET does not fit it.

>Will be VS.NET 2003, Windows.NET 2003... it sound logic.
>
>Regards,
>José Luis.