There is a link on http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,760886,00.asp for message postings about the article, so I posted a message there. I see someone else has already done so too hopefully MORE PEOPLE FROM HERE will take a few mintues to put in their 2 cents.
I still plan to email the author & editor though.

>Much appreciation.
>
>
>>Yes I will post it here. It may not be until late tonight or tommorow I want to read the article first.
>>
>>>Any chance you can post (or send me directly) a copy of the email that you are going to forward to PCMag and/or the article author.
>>>
>>>
>>>>I don't know why I always find this type of stuff suprising you'd think I'd get used to it after a while.
>>>>What needs to happen is EVERYONE in this fourm needs to email PCMag and complain. I certainly plan to I hope others will join because it seems like 90% of them time I'm all alone in such endevors.
>>>>
>>>>>The January 2003 Issue of PC Magazine includes an article on page 116 titled "Databases for ALL Reasons". Reviewed in the story were:
>>>>>Alpha Five v5
>>>>>askSam Professional 5
>>>>>FileMaker Pro 6
>>>>>Microsoft Access 2002
>>>>>MyDatabase 6.0
>>>>>Paradox 10
>>>>>QuickBase
>>>>>and the Editors Choice is... FileMaker Pro! Did you notice anything missing here?
>>>>>
>>>>>On page 124 there is a one-page sidebar on "Migrating from Access to a High-End DBMS". Some of the questions raised just beg for VFP as the answer!! I have not found the article on-line (yet).

ICQ 10556 (ya), 254117