>While VFP should not be referenced in the article, do you think it should be referenced in their list of available database applications? You will find Oracle9i, SQL Server, FileMaker, Access... and everyother database application. Why not VFP? Probably because they have never written an article on it.
>
>Just my $0.02
Well, for the record, PCMag has certainly written on foxpro.
There's a problem with your logic above. You grouped all of the languages/engines they discuss into one list, while in reality they listed a bunch of "grandma's recipes" languages in the article; and three true database engines in the sidebar. I still maintain that VFP does not belong in either list.
(I also maintain that Paradox doesn't belong in the list.)
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts. - Bertrand Russell
