I stand by my original comments. VFP does not belong in the article or sidebar.

Also, I don't think an article such as this carries a whole lot of weight anyway. PCMag is a "techie" magazine. The type of clients that I look for are concerned about their business operations and leave the tech magazines to their technicians.

People are going to continue to purchase the advertised "easy" tools. They're going to get frustated after a while and then they're going to call us to bail them out. Of course, I tell them the only way I'll touch it is a complete re-write in VFP.

Thats $0.04



>While VFP should not be referenced in the article, do you think it should be referenced in their list of available database applications? You will find Oracle9i, SQL Server, FileMaker, Access... and everyother database application. Why not VFP? Probably because they have never written an article on it.
>
>Just my $0.02