>Is not a rule. Is sense.

The name "Visual FoxPro for .NET" is sense too.



>
>Office & windows can be called .NET and be justified becuase support the .NET strategy (Also, office can produce .NET code because a replacement for VBA is in the way, and Windows because is the core support plataform). But VFP is a language, so named it .NET transmit the idea that VFP can produce .NET aplications, and for now is not true.