When MS on its own MSDN site can't mention VFP as one of their own database products, as posted here a couple of weeks ago, why should a third party magazine?
Harold
>The January 2003 Issue of PC Magazine includes an article on page 116 titled "Databases for ALL Reasons". Reviewed in the story were:
>Alpha Five v5
>askSam Professional 5
>FileMaker Pro 6
>Microsoft Access 2002
>MyDatabase 6.0
>Paradox 10
>QuickBase
>and the Editors Choice
is... FileMaker Pro! Did you notice anything missing here?
>
>On page 124 there is a one-page sidebar on "Migrating from Access to a High-End DBMS". Some of the questions raised just beg for VFP as the answer!! I have not found the article on-line (yet).