>>Michel, all I'm asking for is an extra vfp-category, for those who like fundamental discussions. Even a category that has the same handling as the existing categories is fine to me. And the thread was, and is, meant to check what other people think of this idea. I really don't understand your, IMO aversive, reactions.
>
>The messages area should remain accessible to all Universal Thread members without any restriction in place such as moderators to control the content, etc. This would go again its purpose to have someone to decide who can participate or not in a specific category. Since two months, there is some work in progress for what you are asking for. We just ask for a little patience and that should come close to want you ask.
I'm not at all asking for a moderator or any restriction! You still haven't read my orginal message very well.
You ask me to be patient, but I wonder whether the work in progress is really related to what I have in mind, since in all your replies you make the impression on me of having understood only 25 percent of what I intended to communicate.
Groet,
Peter de Valença
Constructive frustration is the breeding ground of genius.
If there’s no willingness to moderate for the sake of good debate, then I have no willingness to debate at all.
Let's develop superb standards that will end the holy wars.
"There are three types of people: Alphas and Betas", said the beta decisively.
If you find this message rude or offensive or stupid, please take a step away from the keyboard and try to think calmly about an eventual a possible alternative explanation of my message.
