Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Free tables vs DBC
Message
From
11/01/2003 13:17:20
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
 
 
To
11/01/2003 13:11:43
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00740632
Message ID:
00740652
Views:
27
>>I am not sure of the complete list; check the manuals. I don't have VFP at this machine. What comes to my mind now is:
>>
>>
  • Long field names.
    >>
  • Validation rules, for fields and records (I don't use these - I prefer triggers).
    >>
  • Referential integrity (RI).
    >>
  • Triggers. Important to update a second table with changes in a first. Triggers are used for RI.
    >>
  • Free tables can't participate in transactions.
    >>
  • Field comments - useful for documentation.
    >>
    >
    >Thank you. No transactions is the killer. I could live without the others.

    That can be quite critical, indeed. I could live without long field-names, and I don't use validation rules, even within a database. Field comments can be documented separately, if need be...

    What I do consider critical is transactions, and RI. Once you start using either of them, you wouldn't want to miss it.

    Hilmar.
    Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
  • Previous
    Reply
    Map
    View

    Click here to load this message in the networking platform