Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Free tables vs DBC
Message
From
13/01/2003 11:11:25
 
 
To
11/01/2003 15:52:35
Charlie Schreiner
Myers and Stauffer Consulting
Topeka, Kansas, United States
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00740632
Message ID:
00741012
Views:
26
>Hi Alejandro,
>I wouldn't use a DBC. You should design the locking such that related tables are sure to be updated. I would also feel free to break some normalization rules along the way. Think about the way VFP does the PJX or VCX files. The Project file has one HomeDir field--only used by one record. That's wrong--but oh so right for the task. We like having the project in a single (or two with the PJT file) file. The VCX/SCX files have a comment record, dataenvironment record and so on. If VFP normalized these files, each ClassLib would be sourced in a variety of files--but I'm glad they don't.

By working more on it, and using views, I can get it down to one dbf and one cdx, or could even eliminate the cdx by creating the indexes on open.

Certainly from the point of view of the user this seems better. Do you think I am overdoing it? Thanks for your idea.

Alex
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform