>I just copied a generic MessageBox() I had. Q&D.

Nothing wrong with Q&D. :-) The point I should have made, instead of making rude noises, was that TRY...CATCH allows you to target your error handling even more specifically than ON ERROR, or even the Error method, does.

Where ON ERROR can be set at any place in your code to call a specific error routine, having a lot of different ON ERRORs leads to less-readable code, IMO. This puts the error handling where it belongs, with the code being handled. That's why I reacted badly to the very-generic catch code you had. Sorry about that. :-)