>Dragan,
>
>>But how will they sell a product with such an ordinary name (I mean "Windows server 2003" - serves what, warm water?) and it's even not dot-net compatible... First time I hear of a M$ product being dead before they even started seriously marketing it.
>
>I think I sense a bit of humor there. Windows Server 2003 is surely "dot-net compatible" since it contains the .NET Framework. It certainly will not be dead on arrival, although many companies will wait for version 2003.1 to adopt it.

Just my feeble attempt to emulate one of "...is dead" threads, riding a different horse for change.