Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Free tables vs DBC
Message
From
16/01/2003 00:30:30
 
 
To
15/01/2003 23:38:53
Hilmar Zonneveld
Independent Consultant
Cochabamba, Bolivia
General information
Forum:
Visual FoxPro
Category:
Databases,Tables, Views, Indexing and SQL syntax
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00740632
Message ID:
00742244
Views:
24
>>As of now, it looks like data should be in a single table (like Excel) that internally contains several tables accessible through views. That requires the use of a DBC, I believe, although I am open to ideas. In any case, the framework we use (Codemine) requires a DBC that we can include in the project because it can be read only, but the data tables will be free tables. In order to keep it down to a single table we'll have to create indices each time we open. Too bad, but using a single table takes precedence.
>
>What would be the advantage of having a single table? It is much easier to manipulate information if it is properly normalized.

From the point of view of our user (a teacher out in the country) a single file seems to make more intuitive sense. (S)he could turn in the file to the office and say: here are the grades for my Algebra I group. It is only the programmers that have to be concerned that the file acually contains three (properly normalized) virtual tables. Thanks to Charlie Schreiner for the seed of this idea.
Previous
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform