>>>I'm quite happy with the VFP debugger, and it hasn't changed much at all since 3.0
>>
>>Ummm... I think you mean 5.0. :-)
>
>Well it's been a while since I touched 3.0 but wasn't the debugger pretty much the same? I
>think the coverage profiler thing was added but other than that???

The 3.0 debugger was the same as the 2.6 debugger. The 5.0 debugger is the one we know and love today. (I remember this because Mac Rubel demonstrated it to our user group about a month before it came out, and I still remember the delight.)