Level Extreme platform
Subscription
Corporate profile
Products & Services
Support
Legal
Français
Client Network Utility Set Up
Message
General information
Forum:
Microsoft SQL Server
Category:
Other
Miscellaneous
Thread ID:
00742890
Message ID:
00743765
Views:
15
This message has been marked as the solution to the initial question of the thread.
I've been looking for some research on tcp/ip vs named pipes and found this in the BOL. Hope it helps.

Named Pipes vs. TCP/IP Sockets
In a fast local area network (LAN) environment, Transmission Control Protocol/Internet Protocol (TCP/IP) Sockets and Named Pipes clients are comparable in terms of performance. However, the performance difference between the TCP/IP Sockets and Named Pipes clients becomes apparent with slower networks, such as across wide area networks (WANs) or dial-up networks. This is because of the different ways the interprocess communication (IPC) mechanisms communicate between peers.

For named pipes, network communications are typically more interactive. A peer does not send data until another peer asks for it using a read command. A network read typically involves a series of peek named pipes messages before it begins to read the data. These can be very costly in a slow network and cause excessive network traffic, which in turn affects other network clients.

It is also important to clarify if you are talking about local pipes or network pipes. If the server application is running locally on the computer running an instance of Microsoft® SQL Server™ 2000, the local Named Pipes protocol is an option. Local named pipes runs in kernel mode and is extremely fast.

For TCP/IP Sockets, data transmissions are more streamlined and have less overhead. Data transmissions can also take advantage of TCP/IP Sockets performance enhancement mechanisms such as windowing, delayed acknowledgements, and so on, which can be very beneficial in a slow network. Depending on the type of applications, such performance differences can be significant.

TCP/IP Sockets also support a backlog queue, which can provide a limited smoothing effect compared to named pipes that may lead to pipe busy errors when you are attempting to connect to SQL Server.

In general, sockets are preferred in a slow LAN, WAN, or dial-up network, whereas named pipes can be a better choice when network speed is not the issue, as it offers more functionality, ease of use, and configuration options.


>In Sql server we need to set up Client Network Utility. In our Window NT NETWORK, we always select TCP/IP and Named Pipes. Which one we should set as default or in the first of the Order? Why?
>
>
>Thanks
>
>
>Jim
Previous
Next
Reply
Map
View

Click here to load this message in the networking platform