>Yes. It does also say (those OSes) "...continue to issue FLUSH commands in the background.".
>Nevertheless, I would like to see two additional things for VFP, and I will be writing a Wish List entry for them:
>1) An option on the FLUSH command to stipulate that the OS is to CONFIRM FLUSH SUCCESS before returning control to VFP;
>2) Improved discussion of the FLUSH command in the VFP Command Reference section of the documentation. It has has only a word or two changed since VFP 2.5 (at least) and the advent of buffering, datasessions, differing handling by different OSes, etc. needs to be described in detail.
Is there a way of disabling this "write-delay"?
Difference in opinions hath cost many millions of lives: for instance, whether flesh be bread, or bread be flesh; whether whistling be a vice or a virtue; whether it be better to kiss a post, or throw it into the fire... (from Gulliver's Travels)
